Conditionalized Imperatives
نویسنده
چکیده
Before talking about conditionalized imperatives, I want to ensure a common understanding of ‘imperative’, namely as a clause type in the sense of Sadock and Zwicky (1985). That means that for a given language L , imperative will be taken to denote one of L ’s form types at sentence level, namely the one tokens of which are prototypically used for REQUESTs or COMMANDs. As such they are paralleled by declaratives (used for ASSERTIONs), interrogatives (for informationseeking QUESTIONs) and for some languages also exclamatives and perhaps more. A natural choice for explaining this clause type system is to assume that it is encoded semantically, in the sense that the semantic object assigned to a particular sentence level form determines its prototypical usage. The actual speech act performed by uttering a token of that type is then determined by the interaction of the semantic object expressed with the context of utterance. Imperatives are wellknown to pose problems for a semantic treatment because they lack a straightforward link to both the anchor of static and dynamic semantics, namely the concepts of truth/falsity and of information growth. In that, they differ from interrogatives that have been linked quite successfully to both via the concept of answerhood. On the other hand, the speech act types associated with imperatives vary too widely in order to associate them in a straightforward way with a speech act (understood as a semantic element) or an alternative update type (as it can be proposed in a dynamic framework, cf. eg. Zarnic (2002), Mastop (2005)). This unclear and most likely non-propositional status is of course most problematic when it comes to (compositional) integration of imperatives into larger compounds, something which is very rare indeed. For example, very few languages allow for imperatives to occurr in indirect speech (cf. Schwager (2005b) for discussion). One of the very few complex sentence types in which (cross-linguistically) imperatives occur quite naturally are conditionals:
منابع مشابه
QoS-Conditionalized Handoff for Mobile IPv6
In this paper we present a scheme that enables a mobile user to perform a ”QoS-conditionalized” handoff when moving to an overlapping area in Mobile IPv6. The idea is to use a QoS hop-by-hop option piggybacked in the binding messages for QoS signaling and conditionalize a handoff upon the availability of sufficient resources along the new transmission path. Our scheme builds upon the hierarchic...
متن کاملPrototype Implementation and Performance Evaluation of a QoS-Conditionalized Handoff Scheme for Mobile IPv6 Networks∗
Future internetworks will include large numbers of portable devices moving among small, wireless cells. In order to support real-time applications, users demand seamless mobility and Quality-of-Service (QoS) provisioning. One approach towards a more flexible, customizable and scalable mobility architecture that also reduces signaling load and handoff latency results from the introduction of mic...
متن کاملTopics in Imperatives
Traditional grammars typically manage to describe imperatives in just a few pages, suggesting there is not much to be said about them, nor to be learned from them. After a somewhat slow start, work on imperatives has really taken off, and many interesting properties of imperatives have now been uncovered (see van der Wurff, this volume, for an overview). Imperatives are relatively short and occ...
متن کاملA logic and semantics for imperatives
Truth is undefined for imperative statements. However, if imperatives implicitly reference a fact, they can be rephrased as truth-valuable declaratives explicitly referencing that fact. But are there such facts? Kenny held that any imperative references a set of wishes held by its imperator. I extend his thesis by proposing that imperator wishes are facts implicitly referenced by imperatives an...
متن کامل